Skip to main content

Fake: Larsen and Toubro Job Interview Letter

┬╖ 2 min read
Jagdish Kumawat
Founder @ Dewiride

At a glance

Verdict
FakeGet the candidate to pay a 'refundable' Rs. 2750 interview-processing deposit via UPI apps and send personal documents and payment screenshots over WhatsApp.
Subject line
not captured
Claimed sender
unknown
Impersonates
Larsen & Toubro тАФ HR job interview call letter
Received
not recorded ┬╖ Published

The post reproduces only an image of the interview call letter; no email headers were captured. The letter demands a refundable Rs. 2750 processing deposit.

Evidence: the message as received plus passive registry lookups; links and attachments are not opened. How we analyse a scam email.

The Candidate has to Deposit a Refundable Interview Processing & Application Processing & Accommodation & Courier / Transportation & Assurance Amount Rs. 2750

Complete LetterтАЛ

Fake Job Interview Letter


Red FlagтАЛ

The document provided exhibits several red flags suggesting it might be part of a scam or fraudulent activity:

  1. Request for Payment for Job Interview: Legitimate companies do not typically require candidates to pay any fees related to processing, interviewing, or securing a job.

  2. Complex Fee Structure with GST and CGST: The inclusion of detailed tax information, such as GST (Goods and Services Tax) and CGST (Central Goods and Services Tax), on a security deposit is unusual and not a practice associated with genuine job offers.

  3. Urgency and Specific Payment Methods: The document creates a sense of urgency with a strict deadline and specifies various payment platforms (Google Pay, Phone Pe, Amazon Pay, etc.), pushing for a quick decision which is a common tactic in scams.

  4. Request for Personal Documents and Payment Screenshots: Asking for personal documents and payment details like passport photocopies, transaction numbers, and payment screenshots is highly unusual and risky.

  5. Inconsistent and Poorly Written Content: There are numerous grammatical errors and awkward phrasing throughout the document, which is uncharacteristic of official communications from reputable organizations.

  6. Unusual HR Practices: The mention of changing the interview location based on the payment of a fee is not a standard HR practice, raising questions about the legitimacy of the process.

  7. Unverifiable Contact Details: The requirement to contact an HR manager by name and send details via WhatsApp is unconventional for formal job application processes, which normally use official email addresses and verified communication channels.

These points suggest that the document may be part of a job scam. It is advisable to verify the authenticity of the job offer directly through official company contact points and to avoid engaging further without thorough verification.


Share this post